Fix non-void function 'fix_options' should return a value.
Add function prototype to tcpd.c and miscd.c.
(From OE-Core rev: 01590c04e875968a7137a67d1683c503a6bad396)
Signed-off-by: Oleksiy Obitotskyy <oobitots@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Fix RDEPENDS
* Upstream v1.12_9 is a development version, not a stable release
* Add UPSTREAM_CHECK_REGEX skip development releases
* Drop anonymous python function to "fix" version, which breaks
auto-upgrade-helper (AUH)
* Use LICENSE file for checksum rather than ephemeral META.yml
* License remains the same
Fixes: [YOCTO #12581]
License-Update: use LICENSE file for checksum
(From OE-Core rev: 613fa79adff798e29ec7f72bff6f060a1832bc89)
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <timothy.t.orling@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* fails for nativesdk-shadow with:
pwconv: /etc/passwd.29063: No such file or directory
pwconv: cannot lock /etc/passwd; try again later.
(From OE-Core rev: c292945611d9f825051ac4938bb22a7d42fff994)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* wrong revision of this patch, where the commit message didn't match
with the default PACKAGECONFIG value, was merged to master, update
it to avoid confusion
* it got enabled by default, but without the dependency on libidn in:
commit 5997981fa2c22609a88b8cbb595dbf7758b2f7c2
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Feb 1 20:02:08 2018 +0200
Subject: iputils: update to 20161105
* https://github.com/iputils/iputils/blob/master/RELNOTES.old
mentiones that IDN was enabled by default in:
[s20160308] and surprisingly the same in [s20150815]
but there are no release notes for s20151218 version we were using until
now, don't know how it really relates to [s20150815].
* but there are some issues with libidn as described in:
f3a461603e
so disable it by default.
(From OE-Core rev: d5cf9fdc57b6e9237126c92a6d92a31099d007c9)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
fixes:
WARNING: libsolv-0.6.33-r0 do_patch:
Some of the context lines in patches were ignored. This can lead to
incorrectly applied patches.
The context lines in the patches can be updated with devtool:
devtool modify <recipe>
devtool finish --force-patch-refresh <recipe> <layer_path>
Then the updated patches and the source tree (in devtool's workspace)
should be reviewed to make sure the patches apply in the correct place
and don't introduce duplicate lines (which can, and does happen
when some of the context is ignored). Further information:
http://lists.openembedded.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2018-March/148675.htmlhttps://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
Details:
Applying patch
0001-Add-fallback-fopencookie-implementation.patch
patching file ext/CMakeLists.txt
patching file ext/solv_xfopen.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 12 with fuzz 1 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 25 (offset -18 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 34 (offset -18 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 46 (offset -18 lines).
patching file ext/solv_xfopen_fallback_fopencookie.c
patching file ext/solv_xfopen_fallback_fopencookie.h
Now at patch 0001-Add-fallback-fopencookie-implementation.patch
(From OE-Core rev: 388a6cdef0a993d781141f7c375a198f4c4ab808)
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* it got enabled by default, but without the dependency on libidn in:
commit 5997981fa2c22609a88b8cbb595dbf7758b2f7c2
Author: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu Feb 1 20:02:08 2018 +0200
Subject: iputils: update to 20161105
* https://github.com/iputils/iputils/blob/master/RELNOTES.old
mentiones that IDN was enabled by default in:
[s20160308] and surprisingly the same in [s20150815]
but there are no release notes for s20151218 version we were using until
now, don't know how it really relates to [s20150815].
* but there are some issues with libidn as described in:
f3a461603e
so disable it by default.
* fails with:
| In file included from ping_common.c:1:0:
| ping.h:39:10: fatal error: idna.h: No such file or directory
| #include <idna.h>
| ^~~~~~~~
* Easiest way to reproduce this failure is to remove libidn from gnutls
PACKAGECONFIG or to use gnutls which doesn't have libidn PACKAGECONFIG
at all (like the one in meta-gplv2).
* First it leads to following QA issue:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/53212/
ERROR: iputils-s20161105-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: iputils-ping rdepends on libidn, but it isn't a build dependency, missing libidn in DEPENDS or PACKAGECONFIG? [build-deps]
ERROR: iputils-s20161105-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue: iputils-traceroute6 rdepends on libidn, but it isn't a build dependency, missing libidn in DEPENDS or PACKAGECONFIG? [build-deps]
ERROR: iputils-s20161105-r0 do_package_qa: QA run found fatal errors.
Please consider fixing them.
ERROR: iputils-s20161105-r0 do_package_qa: Function failed:
do_package_qa
ERROR: Logfile of failure stored in: /OE/build/oe-core/tmp-glibc/work/core2-64-oe-linux/iputils/s20161105-r0/temp/log.do_package_qa.7627
ERROR: Task (/OE/build/oe-core/openembedded-core/meta/recipes-extended/iputils/iputils_s20161105.bb:do_package_qa) failed with exit code '1'
* But if you cleansstate iputils as well (after removing libidn from
gnutls PACKAGECONFIG) to empty iputils RSS, then you get the error about
missing idna.h:
http://errors.yoctoproject.org/Errors/Build/53213/
* Adding the libidn dependency explicitly in iputils recipe fixes the
issue.
(From OE-Core rev: 97defe35051ff86f665547bb6b6497c83b7027a6)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Since watchdog and watchdog-keepalive packages can't be installed
together, move wd_keepalive.service to watchdog-keepalive package.
Remove the inter-dependencies of watchdog and wd_keepalive
services as well.
[YOCTO #12565]
(From OE-Core rev: 1d09eacc78ff44df54d6ace26702f4d9bf9e639c)
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Switch to github as pkgs.fedoraproject.org is down.
(From OE-Core rev: d3a6d7895f8f68042aa5b6c3ce0dcc915f330bd6)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
It became out of date (missing newly added files), and seems no longer necessary for builds.
(From OE-Core rev: 54ca13f0dae8707a7fcbaa308dd797619defb823)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 53f2bbba35c63afa14c5fcb33b83b0ee061840ca)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: df9b991d1f453aae4dca5558f10fd23e866778dc)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 8820d4ffa493d49212f4d8f2665d15c7070a7477)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 561e89baf77741dfa5af9c645f7c471cd7b3880b)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 040b4bb125e28750e089f631c1debb088bb3bc9f)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 93fca640e97643f94ef4f4a5d96c30c971058ec9)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 9f58bd731f33b90849d7d0cb8153dcfedf336ff4)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
These were adding definitions for the second time
(see bug #10450 for why) or adding an include that isn't anymore
necessary for musl builds.
(From OE-Core rev: bed5ea53c74c4b444b2145e7a83ca9fd44ea30ec)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 33f90716bc9890492cc04c4abfe5506f5555d06a)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: fa3180007502affabbe57cb6366be18fbb9e94f8)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 994e43acc67efeb33d859be071609daa844e9b77)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 3c3f76677759156b8cd87659fb4fefb46eb87d13)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 8d4e250383f08e3cd53db809d718910048b9021b)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch was adding a change to the source file that was already there,
so the lines of code were repeated twice. This didn't create a bug or a
security issue, but it may well have.
Long story:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10450
(From OE-Core rev: 1fc1a5f392ec6773cd520cbbd19b58931c6a2d66)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 49437de120ffdf26396fb295254f51ccc204560a)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 4ff1dbbd33b31212e8ba2bb9f269c80b5f08566c)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 33dadb98c10fdf04d9ed9b6ba57de6257873bcea)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 9d0c090466f97a894660e8f42b3a35a7dcd57f56)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
0.6.32 -> 0.6.33
* new Selection.clone() method in the bindings
* new pool.parserpmrichdep() method in the bindings
* fix bad assignment in solution refinement that led to a memory leak
* use license tag instead of doc in the spec file [bnc#1082318]
(From OE-Core rev: 57a4c4bc5fddf920af2745d7d9ff87a76bdd9807)
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: e3e8c2ec038c95d8203c4886ef46aec6b0741837)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: fc856d4539a13f1ea6bf7ce347e9ca85577ecfb8)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: e0a363d3374738d1bc8a0889dade83d2c35ef964)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 4a0c9bb514ff3d6966f1da480cd48c076403f58d)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: b45ce6dbbd459ecc96eae76b5695927dbda1dbb4)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: 7c8e3b9bd26b35654f3bd24bbb8d86b8c6e34a67)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
The patch tool will apply patches by default with "fuzz", which is where if the
hunk context isn't present but what is there is close enough, it will force the
patch in.
Whilst this is useful when there's just whitespace changes, when applied to
source it is possible for a patch applied with fuzz to produce broken code which
still compiles (see #10450). This is obviously bad.
We'd like to eventually have do_patch() rejecting any fuzz on these grounds. For
that to be realistic the existing patches with fuzz need to be rebased and
reviewed.
(From OE-Core rev: a441306ce9de4ca1cc07dfb8aa330e8d6d67e651)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Enable ptest using new ptest-perl.bbclass
(From OE-Core rev: 04f49bc0f9c56ef9b6970891058c200968c5ded9)
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <timothy.t.orling@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Required by the new dtc rdepends to avoid errors like this:
ERROR: Required build target 'ionel-rpi-image' has no buildable providers.
Missing or unbuildable dependency chain was: ['ionel-rpi-image', 'nativesdk-packagegroup-sdk-host', 'nativesdk-qemu', 'nativesdk-dtc', 'nativesdk-diffutils']
(From OE-Core rev: dc3829f31bcc7522e8eb457623a74655a738c0d9)
Signed-off-by: Ioan-Adrian Ratiu <adi@adirat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Enable ptest by inheriting new ptest-perl.bbclass
* Install testfiles/ into PTEST_PATH
(From OE-Core rev: 79e1d94e6c08610971c66637a59149b8b9c0ab72)
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <timothy.t.orling@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Enable ptest by inheriting new ptest-perl.bbclass
(From OE-Core rev: f593f9eedcb3e96b1904bc8250ce9353130de62b)
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <timothy.t.orling@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Enable pteset with new ptest-perl.bbclass
(From OE-Core rev: ee6ce738dcc5fe5ae0117c8b9b86c5ce3d498648)
Signed-off-by: Tim Orling <timothy.t.orling@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* replace do_pam_sanity function with distro_features_check inherit
* fixes:
WARNING: libpam-1.3.0-r5 do_pam_sanity: Building libpam but 'pam' isn't in DISTRO_FEATURES, PAM won't work correctly
in world builds and prevents user to build libpam at all without pam
in DISTRO_FEATURES, I don't see any users of this which wouldn't respect
pam in DISTRO_FEATURES
* only libuser is depending on libpam without respecting DISTRO_FEATURES
* there are few recipes in meta-oe layers depending on libpam without
respecting DISTRO_FEATURES, I've sent patch for them:
samba, openwsman, pam-ssh-agent-auth, sblim-sfcb, passwdqc, python-pam, smbnetfs
and omxplayer in meta-raspberrypi, I've sent PR for that one:
https://github.com/agherzan/meta-raspberrypi/pull/192
* poky-lsb will need to add pam to DISTRO_FEATURES in order to build
packagegroup-core-lsb
(From OE-Core rev: c9e7a276859d38aaa03845ee09428f62760ad147)
Signed-off-by: Martin Jansa <Martin.Jansa@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
* Remove debian.patch which is already in the source.
* License-Update: The license is changed to GPLv3, and move v2 one to meta-gplv2.
* Merge time.inc into time_1.8.bb.
(From OE-Core rev: c17e1a1c4e0c227efc848a7dec1a00a29080e917)
Signed-off-by: Robert Yang <liezhi.yang@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
libtirpc prior to 1.0.2 assumed that the system provided nis.h but this isn't
always true. Until now we've been using a tarball of the missing files from
Gentoo, but libtirpc 1.0.2 added a copy of nis.h to the sources so this isn't
required anymore.
(From OE-Core rev: a6e786e7c8bed33fa269aac99724df606829ec6f)
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
0.6.31 -> 0.6.32
(From OE-Core rev: 47bcb610a1dac0e118c5ec756a748865c93bec4d)
Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
1.Upgrade sudo from 1.8.21P1 to 1.8.22.
2.Update the checksum of LIC_FILES_CHKSUM.
The following content is appended to doc/LICENSE, plugins/sudoers/redblack.c.
Todd C. Miller <Todd.Miller@courtesan.com> -> Todd C. Miller <Todd.Miller@sudo.ws>
(From OE-Core rev: 05e8601dcbf6ba8500696d874c483f9ac8df71fa)
Signed-off-by: Huang Qiyu <huangqy.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
Until now oe-core has been using a well obsolete implementation of man.
Man-db on the other hand is used by all modern Linux distros, is actively
maintained, has a standard build system, and does not require 30 patches
to build.
(From OE-Core rev: 69e549a841a1681f927667f5017a1cd669ac9914)
Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin <alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ross Burton <ross.burton@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
